GOP/Conservative paradox not puzzling at all

In a post right below  here, Doug Gibson looks at recent polling data and wonders why more Americans call themselves conservative, but the Republican Party is losing ground.

I posted a response to him there, but thought I’d expand on it here.

I’ve been telling Doug for some time now that the terms “Republican” and “Conservative” don’t mean anything any more. Same thing goes for “liberal” and “democrat.”

You can be conservative (the adjective) without being A CONSERVATIVE (the noun) if you catch my drift — the title is totally disassociated from the action, and the Republican Party even more so. In Nixon’s Checkers speech he said his wife Pat had “a good Republican cloth coat,” and he chose that phrase very carefully because the Republican party fancies itself as the party of the common man, and the common man watches his pennies.

I’m conservative because that is how I lead my life — simply, cheaply, with an affinity for small consumption, little govenrment intrusion and a demand that government pay for what it buys, just like me.

The group of people who call themselves the core of the Republican party, and claim to be conservatives (noun) are not conservative (adjective) at all — they believe in massive government spending and debt, huge expansion of government powers and intruding government oversight into the doctor’s office — they live in massive expensive houses, drive massive expensive cars and lead massive expensive lives.

I believe in paying for what you buy — yes, even if that includes raising taxes. The so-called “conservatives” of the so-called “Republican” party threw two wars and actually cut government revenue, through tax cuts.

That’s fiscally irresponsible and politically insane. It tells the people that they can have something for nothing and put the whole thing on the nation’s Visa card. That’s a policy that’s good for short-term gains in popularity, but in the long run is unsustainable, as the current national deficit shows. It hit a trillion under Obama, but the path was set under 8 years of  Bush, who added trillions of dollars to the national debt while continually promising that his budget would balance someday, always in the future.

I believe in smaller and less intrusive government. That includes staying the hell out of life-or-death medical decisions such as that brain dead chick that our Rep. Biship was ready to fly across the Atlantic, at massive public expensive, to vote to intrude the federal government into. Government has no business at all making rules about who can get married, who can get an abortion, or who can be tought how to keep from getting pregnant. The expansion of government snooping powers under the so-called “Patriot” act is frightening in the extreme.

I believe in effeciency and eliminating waste. That means, among many other things, making health care available for all to cut medical bankruptcies and avoid forcing people to wait until they’re so sick they qualify for emergency room treatment, as President Bush so blithly advice people to do.

So, yeah, I’m conservative. Sadly, the Republican party, which is composed of a lot of people who call themselves conservatives, is the antithesis of all I stand for.

And, please note, I am very aware that the Republican party SAYS it is for much of what I believe in. Sadly for them, I look at actions, not words. When the Republican party starts acting like real conservatives, I’ll be happy to give it another look.

This entry was posted in Blogging the Rambler. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to GOP/Conservative paradox not puzzling at all

  1. Well said, I have always wondered why conservatives are so named since they don’t seem to want to “conserve” anything!

  2. Flatlander100 says:

    What Charlie said.

  3. laytonian says:

    Me three.

    When Ayn Rand became popular again, it was obvious that the only thing Republicans wanted to “conserve”, was their own money.

    Greed is good (again).
    Selfishness is next to Godliness.

  4. Charles Trentelman says:

    never read rand — funny thing is, they’re not even good at conserving their own money — aren’t those the same guys who leveraged wall street into oblivion?

  5. dan s. says:

    Thanks again, Charlie, for all your efforts to rescue the words “liberal” and “conservative”.

  6. Dovie says:

    I laugh. The biggest dichotomy in the world is how Utahns can possibly perceive themselves to be simultaneously the greatest Christians ever and the free-thinking descendants of Ayn Rand. The last thing you could accuse Rand of is being a joiner. She was an athiest. I have a personal saying: The true followers of Ayn Rand are not registered Republicans running around in magic underwear.

    What a joke.

    Also, it makes no more sense to ascribe to the ideology of a right wing FICTION book than to ascribe to a left wing FICTION book about living in a commune..

  7. laytonian says:

    Dovie, you laugh?

    Keep up. The right wing has been bowing down to Rand for years. You don’t realize that Alan Greenspan is an Ayn Rand adherent?

    Wow. It’s pretty shocking to find out how UNinformed Utahns are.

    Perhaps you could investigate the new Ayn Rand biography. I know you know how to do the research.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>