In the 19th century, for many in the East Coast of the United States, Brigham Young may have been the image they saw when they thought of Mormonism, but the ideas they heard coming from the new religion came mostly from the Apostle Orson Pratt.
That’s a conclusion reached by Top of Utah author Breck England, in his still-important biography of Pratt, “The Life and Thought of Orson Pratt.” The book published in 1985 by University of Utah Press, is getting hard to purchase. Copies usually run about $60-plus on amazon.com. I picked up a copy at a local library and was fascinated by Pratt, who was considered a rationalist thinker who often clashed with President Brigham Young, who preferred a more “meat and potatoes” interpretation of the Gospel.
Pratt, the brother of the more flamboyant Parley, lifted himself out of poverty to become Mormonism’s top intellectual. He was blessed with an amazing brain. He authored an unpublished textbook on calculus and penned a text on algebra that was cited by academics of the era. He was responsible for creating an odometer that could accurately log miles accumulated by wagon trains. He was instrumental in mapping the Salt Lake valley after the pioneers arrived. In fact, England notes that the parcel alloted to Pratt is today prime commercial real estate just south of Temple Square.
One can speculate that Pratt’s natural interest in science attracted him to follow Joseph Smith. Later in his ministry he developed the intelligence-matter theory, inspired by Joseph Smith’s teachings. The theology of endless worlds and gods progressing in eternity was manna to Pratt’s mind, and he was a fervent advocate of it his whole life.
Early in the his church membership, Pratt almost left Mormonism. The first was over a bank failure. The second was more serious and led to a short excommunication of Pratt and his wife. While he was away preaching, allegations were made in Nauvoo of impropriety between Smith, his associate John C. Bennett, and Pratt’s wife Sarah. Sarah Pratt claimed that Smith had asked her to be a plural wife. Smith claimed Sarah had had an affair with Bennett. Pratt initially sided with his wife. Eventually, Pratt and Sarah returned to fellowship in the young church and Bennett was excommunicated. He later became a prominent enemy of the church.
It is impossible to know what really happened, but apparently the bad feelings and scars never subsided. Years later, the Pratts separated and Sarah became an enthusiastic enemy of the LDS church, teaching her children to hate it.
Pratt’s excommunication reversed his placement in the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles and likely prevented him from becoming church president. For the rest of his life, he was a vigorous defender of Mormonism, the Book of Mormon and Joseph Smith. He was often called to Europe to lead missions and church publications. While in Germany he denounced that nation’s refusal to allow any religions besides catholicism a chance. Pratt also translated the Book of Mormon into the church-created phonetic language Deseret.
Late in his life, Pratt was more mellow and less eager to explore unique looks into Mormonism or Christian theology. This was probably in large part due to Young and other apostles publicly denouncing some of Pratt’s ideas. In fact, some of his books were hunted down and destroyed by church leaders.
Pratt accepted these rebukes humbly and urged church members to ignore his writings that were condemned by Young. Perhaps the Nauvoo battle, with his near expulsion from the church and failed marriage had worn him down and he wanted peace. Or, perhaps he truly believed his painstaking research was now a detriment to the church.
According to Breck, Pratt left a legacy of philosophy to Mormonism. His belief in an energy of one and many attempts to rationalize science and theology have been explored countless times since his death.
This column ran in today’s edition of Currents, the Standard’s online-only digital section. It is accompanied by an original cartoon from the Standard’s Cal Grondahl. All subscribers have access to Currents. For assistance, call (801) 625-4400.
There are 7 comments.



Michael Trujillo
on Jun 19th, 2009
@ 12:47 pm:
What is intelligence-matter theory? A quick google search didn’t bring those three words together in any result. Is it found only in the biography you read?
Doug Gibson
on Jun 19th, 2009
@ 1:02 pm:
To clarify, I will add this: Here’s a link:
http://www.juvenileinstructor.org/mormonism%E2%80%99s-varying-influences-on-orson-pratt%E2%80%99s-thought/
I probably should not have said “intelligence,” but in Mormonism the word intelligences is often used. Sorry if it confused.
Doug Gibson
Neal Humphrey
on Jun 20th, 2009
@ 6:28 am:
O. Pratt developed a cosmology that was published In “The Seer.” Mormonism doesn’t have a systematic and broadly accepted doctrine of creation that answers questions about The Beginning. Mormon deities are evolved beings who have progressed from existing as an “intelligence,” to a “spirit” in the pre-existence, to a human experience on a world that was organized by a deity, and then progressing after resurrection to a divine status. However, such deities live in time and space and are limited to organizing planets from “yonder matter.”
This cosmology of “eternal progression” still leave open the questions of “Where did matter (the universe) come from?” and “Where did the intelligences come from.” One possible interpretation of O. Pratt’s cosmology is that the pre-existent “intelligences” were a cosmic and sort of Jungian “sea of being” who cooperatively created the universe.
As a note, this is a sharp contrast to the Judeo-Christian cosmology of the universe being created from nothing by an all-powerful God who lives beyond time and space. God is not bound by the laws of the universe because they are part of his creation.
Preston McConkie
on Jun 21st, 2009
@ 6:52 pm:
Mr. Humphrey, you make a good point, but in actuality LDS doctrine declares that the so-called “laws of nature” are, indeed, the dictates of God. Only those members who wish to reconcile LDS doctrine with organic evolution seem fixated on the heresy that “God works according to natural laws” — as if there are ANY laws without a lawmaker.
It does not follow from reason alone, however, that in order to be the master of all existence, that God does not exist within time or space. Nor is that a doctrine indisputably established in scripture, especially once one examines the oldest texts in the least corrupted languages. On top of that, LDS scripture explicity teaches the opposite. Mormons don’t have to be embarrassed that their doctrines differ from those who depend mostly on medieval creeds hammered out by theologians lacking the gift of revelation.
Doug, I like this one better than your treatment of the last Pratt brother, but I still wish you wouldn’t take the disinterested observer’s position that the derogatory, naturalistic explanations of Mormon explanation of history are just as plausible as their opposites — and that we can’t have intellectual confidence in sympathetic explanations.
Neal Humphrey
on Jun 22nd, 2009
@ 10:02 am:
Mr. McConkie – thanks for the comment. It will be very useful in my teaching.
New Mormon Books » Blog Archive » Review: The Life and Thought of Orson Pratt
on Jul 13th, 2009
@ 10:54 am:
[...] Political Surf on the life of Mormonism’s first intellectual by Doug Gibson. The Political Surf, Ogden Standard Examiner Blogs, Jun 19th, 2009. http://blogs.standard.net/2009/06/19/political-surf-on-the-life-of-mormonisms-first-intellectual/ [...]
Joseph Smith
on Aug 1st, 2009
@ 9:02 am:
Orson Pratt was always out on a limb with his spiritual teachings. He was the one who publicly introduced the plural wife doctrine to the church and world. Thanks to the Utah digital library of newspapers, many of his sermons have been saved.